AI Adoption at the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund (NBIM): From Cost Reduction to Capability-Driven Organizational Transformation

Case Overview and Innovations

The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund (NBIM) has systematically embedded large language models (LLMs) and machine learning into its investment research, trading, and operational workflows. AI is no longer treated as a set of isolated tools, but as a “capability foundation” and a catalyst for reshaping organizational work practices.

The central theme of this case is clear: aligning measurable business KPIs—such as trading costs, productivity, and hours saved—with engineered governance (AI gateways, audit trails, data stewardship) and organizational enablement (AI ambassadors, mandatory micro-courses, hackathons), thereby advancing from “localized automation” to “enterprise-wide intelligence.”

Three innovations stand out:

1. Integrating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), LLMs, and structured financial models to create explainable business loops.

2. Coordinating trading execution and investment insights within a unified platform to enable end-to-end optimization from “discovery → decision → execution.”

3. Leveraging organizational learning mechanisms as a scaling lever—AI ambassadors and competitions rapidly extend pilots into replicable production capabilities.

Application Scenarios and Effectiveness

Trading Execution and Cost Optimization

In trade execution, NBIM applies order-flow modeling, microstructure prediction, and hybrid routing (rules + ML) to significantly reduce slippage and market impact costs. Anchored to disclosed savings, cost minimization is treated as a top priority. Technically, minute- and second-level feature engineering combined with regression and graph neural networks predicts market impact risks, while strategy-driven order slicing and counterparty selection optimize timing and routing. The outcome is direct: fewer unnecessary reallocations, compressed execution costs, and measurable enhancements in investment returns.

Research Bias Detection and Quality Improvement

On the research side, NBIM deploys behavioral feature extraction, attribution analysis, and anomaly detection to build a “bias detection engine.” This system identifies drift in manager or team behavior—style, holdings, or trading patterns—and feeds the findings back into decision-making, supported by evidence chains and explainable reports. The effect is tangible: improved team decision consistency and enhanced research coverage efficiency. Research tasks—including call transcripts and announcement parsing—benefit from natural language search, embeddings, and summarization, drastically shortening turnaround time (TAT) and improving information capture.

Enterprise Copilot and Organizational Capability Diffusion

By building a retrieval-augmented enterprise Copilot (covering natural language queries, automated report generation, and financial/compliance Q&A), NBIM achieved productivity gains across roles. Internal estimates and public references indicate productivity improvements of around 20%, equating to hundreds of thousands of hours saved annually. More importantly, the real value lies not merely in time saved but in freeing experts from repetitive cognitive tasks, allowing them to focus on higher-value judgment and contextual strategy.

Risk and Governance

NBIM did not sacrifice governance for speed. Instead, it embedded “responsible AI” into its stack—via AI gateways, audit logs, model cards, and prompt/output DLP—as well as into its processes (human-in-the-loop validation, dual-loop evaluation). This preserves flexibility for model iteration and vendor choice, while ensuring outputs remain traceable and explainable, reducing compliance incidents and data leakage risks. Practice confirms that for highly trusted financial institutions, governance and innovation must advance hand in hand.

Key Insights and Broader Implications for AI Adoption

Business KPIs as the North Star

NBIM’s experience shows that AI adoption in financial institutions must be directly tied to clear financial or operational KPIs—such as trading costs, per-capita productivity, or research coverage—otherwise, organizations risk falling into the “PoC trap.” Measuring AI investments through business returns ensures sharper prioritization and resource discipline.

From Tools to Capabilities: Technology Coupled with Organizational Learning

While deploying isolated tools may yield quick wins, their impact is limited. NBIM’s breakthrough lies in treating AI as an organizational capability: through AI ambassadors, micro-learning, and hackathons, individual skills are scaled into systemic work practices. This “capabilization” pathway transforms one-off automation benefits into sustainable competitive advantage.

Secure and Controllable as the Prerequisite for Scale

In highly sensitive asset management contexts, scaling AI requires robust governance. AI gateways, audit trails, and explainability mechanisms act as safeguards for integrating external model capabilities into internal workflows, while maintaining compliance and auditability. Governance is not a barrier but the very foundation for sustainable large-scale adoption.

Technology and Strategy as a Double Helix: Balancing Short-Term Gains and Long-Term Capability

NBIM’s case underscores a layered approach: short-term gains through execution optimization and Copilot productivity; mid-term gains from bias detection and decision quality improvements; long-term gains through systematic AI infrastructure and talent development that reshape organizational competitiveness. Technology choices must balance replaceability (avoiding vendor lock-in) with domain fine-tuning (ensuring financial-grade performance).

Conclusion: From Testbed to Institutionalized Practice—A Replicable Path

The NBIM example demonstrates that for financial institutions to transform AI from an experimental tool into a long-term source of value, three questions must be answered:

1. What business problem is being solved (clear KPIs)?

2. What technical pathway will deliver it (engineering, governance, data)?

3. How will the organization internalize new capabilities (talent, processes, incentives)?

When these elements align, AI ceases to be a “black box” or a “showpiece,” and instead becomes the productivity backbone that advances efficiency, quality, and governance in parallel. For peer institutions, this case serves both as a practical blueprint and as a strategic guide to embedding intelligence into organizational DNA.

Related Topic

Generative AI: Leading the Disruptive Force of the Future
HaxiTAG EiKM: The Revolutionary Platform for Enterprise Intelligent Knowledge Management and Search
From Technology to Value: The Innovative Journey of HaxiTAG Studio AI
HaxiTAG: Enhancing Enterprise Productivity with Intelligent Knowledge Management Solutions
HaxiTAG Studio: AI-Driven Future Prediction Tool
A Case Study:Innovation and Optimization of AI in Training Workflows
HaxiTAG Studio: The Intelligent Solution Revolutionizing Enterprise Automation
Exploring How People Use Generative AI and Its Applications
HaxiTAG Studio: Empowering SMEs with Industry-Specific AI Solutions
Maximizing Productivity and Insight with HaxiTAG EIKM System

Read more →

Walmart’s Deep Insights and Strategic Analysis on Artificial Intelligence Applications

In today’s rapidly evolving retail landscape, data has become the core driver of business growth. As a global retail giant, Walmart deeply understands the value of data and actively embraces artificial intelligence (AI) to maintain its leadership in an increasingly competitive market. This article, from the perspective of a retail technology expert, provides an in-depth analysis of how Walmart integrates AI into its operations and customer experience (CX), and offers professional, precise, and authoritative insights into its AI strategy in light of broader industry trends.

Walmart AI Application Case Studies

1. Intelligent Customer Support: Redefining Service Interactions

Walmart’s customer service chatbot goes beyond traditional Q&A functions, marking a leap toward “agent-based AI.” The system not only responds to routine inquiries but can also directly execute critical actions such as canceling orders and initiating refunds. This innovation streamlines the customer service process, replacing lengthy, multi-step human intervention with instant, seamless self-service. Customers can handle order changes without cumbersome navigation or long waiting times, significantly boosting satisfaction. This customer-centric design reduces friction, optimizes the overall experience, and still intelligently escalates complex or emotionally nuanced cases to human agents. This aligns with broader industry trends, where AI-driven chatbots reduce customer service costs by approximately 30%, delivering both efficiency gains and cost savings [1].

2. Personalized Shopping Experience: Building the Future of “Retail for One”

Personalization through AI is at the core of Walmart’s strategy to improve satisfaction and loyalty. By analyzing customer interests, search history, and purchasing behavior, Walmart’s AI dynamically generates personalized homepage content and integrates customized text and imagery. As Hetvi Damodhar, Senior Director of E-commerce Personalization at Walmart, explains, the goal is to create “a truly unique store for every shopper—where the most relevant Walmart is already on your phone.” Since adopting AI, Walmart’s customer satisfaction scores have risen by 38%.

Looking ahead, Walmart is piloting solution-based search. Instead of merely typing “balloons” or “candles,” a customer might ask, “Help me plan a birthday party for my niece,” and the system intelligently assembles a comprehensive product list for the event. This “effortless CX” reduces decision-making costs and simplifies the shopping journey, granting Walmart a competitive edge over online rivals like Amazon. The approach reflects industry-wide trends emphasizing hyper-personalized experiences and AI-powered visual and voice search [2, 3].

3. Intelligent Inventory Optimization: Enhancing Supply-Demand Precision and Operational Resilience

Inventory management has always been a complex retail challenge. Walmart has revolutionized this process with its AI assistant, Wally. Wally processes massive, complex datasets and answers merchant questions about inventory, shipping, and supply in natural language—eliminating the need to interpret complex tables and charts. Its functions include data entry and analysis, root cause identification for product performance anomalies, ticket creation for issue resolution, and predictive modeling to forecast customer interest.

With Wally, Walmart achieves “the right product at the right place at the right time,” effectively preventing stockouts or overstocking. This improves supply chain efficiency and responsiveness while freeing merchants from tedious analysis, enabling focus on higher-value strategic decisions. Wally demonstrates the transformative potential of AI in inventory optimization and streamlined operations [4, 5].

4. Robotics in Operations: Automation Driving Efficiency

Walmart’s adoption of robotics strengthens both speed and accuracy in physical operations. In warehouses, robots move and sort goods, accelerating processing and reducing errors. In stores, robots scan shelves and identify misplaced or missing items, improving shelf accuracy and minimizing human error. This allows employees to focus on customer service and value-added management tasks. Enhanced automation reduces labor costs, accelerates response times, and is becoming a key driver of productivity and customer experience improvements in retail [6].

Conclusion and Expert Commentary

Walmart’s comprehensive deployment of AI demonstrates strategic foresight and deep insight as a retail industry leader. Its AI applications extend across the entire retail value chain—from front-end customer interaction to back-end supply chain management. This end-to-end AI enablement has yielded significant benefits in three dimensions:

1. Enhanced Customer Experience: Personalized recommendations, intelligent search, and agent-style chatbots create a seamless, highly customized shopping journey, elevating satisfaction and loyalty.

2. Breakthroughs in Operational Efficiency: Wally’s inventory optimization and robotics in warehouses and stores deliver significant efficiency gains, cost reductions, and stronger supply chain resilience.

3. Employee Empowerment: AI tools liberate staff from repetitive, low-value tasks, allowing them to focus on creative and strategic contributions that improve overall organizational performance.

Walmart’s case clearly illustrates that AI is no longer a “nice-to-have” in retail, but rather the cornerstone of competitive advantage and sustainable growth. Through data-driven decision-making, intelligent process reengineering, and customer-centric innovation, Walmart is building a smarter, more efficient, and agile retail ecosystem. Its success offers valuable lessons for peers: in the era of digital transformation, only by deeply integrating AI can retailers remain competitive, continuously create customer value, and lead the future trajectory of the industry.

Related topic:

How to Get the Most Out of LLM-Driven Copilots in Your Workplace: An In-Depth Guide
Empowering Sustainable Business Strategies: Harnessing the Potential of LLM and GenAI in HaxiTAG ESG Solutions
The Application and Prospects of HaxiTAG AI Solutions in Digital Asset Compliance Management
HaxiTAG: Enhancing Enterprise Productivity with Intelligent Knowledge Management Solutions
Empowering Enterprise Sustainability with HaxiTAG ESG Solution and LLM & GenAI Technology
The Application of HaxiTAG AI in Intelligent Data Analysis
How HaxiTAG AI Enhances Enterprise Intelligent Knowledge Management
Effective PR and Content Marketing Strategies for Startups: Boosting Brand Visibility
Leveraging HaxiTAG AI for ESG Reporting and Sustainable Development

Read more →

From System Records to Agent Records: Workday’s Enterprise AI Transformation Paradigm—A Future of Human–Digital Agent Coexistence

Based on a McKinsey Inside the Strategy Room interview with Workday CEO Carl Eschenbach (August 21, 2025), combined with Workday official materials and third-party analyses, this study focuses on enterprise transformation driven by agentic AI. Workday’s practical experience in human–machine collaborative intelligence offers valuable insights.

In enterprise AI transformation, two extremes must be avoided: first, treating AI as a “universal cost-cutting tool,” falling into the illusion of replacing everything while neglecting business quality, risk, and experience; second, refusing to experiment due to uncertainty, thereby missing opportunities to elevate efficiency and value.

The proper approach positions AI as a “productivity-enhancing digital colleague” under a governance and measurement framework, aiming for measurable productivity gains and new value creation. By starting with small pilots and iterative scaling, cost reduction, efficiency enhancement, and innovation can be progressively unified.

Overview

Workday’s AI strategy follows a “human–agent coexistence” paradigm. Using consistent data from HR and finance systems of record (SOR) and underpinned by governance, the company introduces an “Agent System of Record (ASR)” to centrally manage agent registration, permissions, costs, and performance—enabling a productivity leap from tool to role-based agent.

Key Principles and Concepts

1. Coexistence, Not Replacement: AI’s power comes from being “agentic”—technology working for you. Workday clearly positions AI for peaceful human–agent coexistence.

2. Domain Data and Business Context Define the Ceiling: The CEO emphasizes that data quality and domain context, especially in HR and finance, are foundational. Workday serves over 10,000 enterprises, accumulating structured processes and data assets across clients.

3. Three-System Perspective: HR, finance, and customer SORs form the enterprise AI foundation. Workday focuses on the first two and collaborates with the broader ecosystem (e.g., Salesforce).

4. Speed and Culture as Multipliers: Treating “speed” as a strategic asset and cultivating a growth-oriented culture through service-oriented leadership that “enables others.”

---

Practice and Governance (Workday Approach)

• ASR Platform Governance: Unified directories and observability for centralized control of in-house and third-party agents; role and permission management, registration and compliance tracking, cost budgeting and ROI monitoring, real-time activity and strategy execution, and agent orchestration/interconnection via A2A/MCP protocols (Agent Gateway). Digital colleagues in HaxiTAG Bot Factory provide similar functional benefits in enterprise scenarios.

• Role-Based (Multi-Skill) Agents: Upgrade from task-based to configurable “role” agents, covering high-value processes such as recruiting, talent mobility, payroll, contracts, financial audit, and policy compliance.

• Responsible AI System: Appoint a Chief Responsible AI Officer and employ ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF for independent validation and verification, forming a governance loop for bias, security, explainability, and appeals.

• Organizational Enablement: Systematic AI training for 20,000+ employees to drive full human–agent collaboration.

Value Proposition and Business Implications

• From “Application-Centric” to “Role-Agent-Centric” Experience: Users no longer “click apps” but collaborate with context-aware role agents, requiring rethinking of traditional UI and workflow orchestration.

• Measurable Digital Workforce TCO/ROI: ASR treats agents as “digital employees,” integrating budget, cost, performance, and compliance into a single ledger, facilitating CFO/CHRO/CAIO governance and investment decisions.

• Ecosystem and Interoperability: Agent Gateway connects external agents (partners or client-built), mitigating “agent sprawl” and shadow IT risks.

Methodology: A Reusable Enterprise Deployment Framework

1. Objective Function: Maximize productivity, minimize compliance/risk, and enhance employee experience; define clear boundaries for tasks agents can independently perform.

2. Priority Scenarios: Select high-frequency, highly regulated, and clean-data HR/finance processes (e.g., payroll verification, policy responses, compliance audits, contract obligation extraction) as MVPs.

3. ASR Capability Blueprint:

   • Directory: Agent registration, profiles (skills/capabilities), tracking, explainability;

   • Identity & Permissions: Least privilege, cross-system data access control;

   • Policy & Compliance: Policy engine, action audits, appeals, accountability;

   • Economics: Budgeting, A/B and performance dashboards, task/time/result accounting;

   • Connectivity: Agent Gateway, A2A/MCP protocol orchestration.

4. “Onboard Agents Like Humans”: Implement lifecycle management and RACI assignment for “hire–trial–performance–promotion–offboarding” to prevent over-authorization or improper execution.

5. Responsible AI Governance: Align with ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF; establish processes and metrics (risk registry, bias testing, explainability thresholds, red teaming, SLA for appeals), and regularly disclose internally and externally.

6. Organization and Culture: Embed “speed” in OKRs/performance metrics, emphasize leadership in “serving others/enabling teams,” and establish CAIO/RAI committees with frontline coaching mechanisms.

Industry Insight: Instead of full-scale rollout, adopt a four-piece “role–permission–metric–governance” loop, gradually delegating authority to create explainable autonomy.

Assessment and Commentary

Workday unifies humans and agents within existing HR/finance SORs and governance, balancing compliance with practical deployment density, shortening the path from pilot to scale. Constraints and risks include:

1. Ecosystem Lock-In: ASR strongly binds to Workday data and processes; open protocols and Marketplace can mitigate this.

2. Cross-System Consistency: Agents spanning ERP/CRM/security domains require end-to-end permission and audit linkage to avoid “shadow agents.”

3. Measurement Complexity: Agent value must be assessed by both process and outcome (time saved ≠ business result).

Sources: McKinsey interview with Workday CEO on “coexistence, data quality, three-system perspective, speed and leadership, RAI and training”; Workday official pages/news on ASR, Agent Gateway, role agents, ROI, and Responsible AI; HFS, Josh Bersin, and other industry analyses on “agent sprawl/governance.”

Related topic:

Maximizing Efficiency and Insight with HaxiTAG LLM Studio, Innovating Enterprise SolutionsEnhancing Enterprise Development: Applications of Large Language Models and Generative AIUnlocking Enterprise Success: The Trifecta of Knowledge, Public Opinion, and IntelligenceRevolutionizing Information Processing in Enterprise Services: The Innovative Integration of GenAI, LLM, and Omni ModelMastering Market Entry: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding and Navigating New Business Landscapes in Global MarketsHaxiTAG's LLMs and GenAI Industry Applications - Trusted AI SolutionsEnterprise AI Solutions: Enhancing Efficiency and Growth with Advanced AI Capabilities

Read more →

AI-Native GTM Teams Run 38% Leaner: The New Normal?

Companies under $25M ARR with high AI adoption are running with just 13 GTM FTEs versus 21 for their traditional SaaS peers—a 38% reduction in headcount while maintaining competitive growth rates.

But here’s what’s really interesting: This efficiency advantage seems to fade as companies get larger. At least right now.

This suggests there’s a critical window for AI-native advantages, and founders who don’t embrace these approaches early may find themselves permanently disadvantaged against competitors who do.

The Numbers Don’t Lie: AI Creates Real Leverage

GTM Headcount by AI Adoption (<$25M ARR companies):

• Total GTM FTEs: 13 (High AI) vs 21 (Medium/Low AI)
• Post-Sales allocation: 25% vs 33% (8-point difference)
• Revenue Operations: 17% vs 12% (more AI-focused RevOps)

What This Means in Practice: A typical $15M ARR company with high AI adoption might run with:

• sales reps (vs 8 for low adopters)
• 3 post-sales team members (vs 7 for low adopters)
• 2 marketing team members (vs 3 for low adopters)
• 2 revenue operations specialists (vs 3 for low adopters)

The most dramatic difference is in post-sales, where high AI adopters are running with 8 percentage points less headcount allocation—suggesting that AI is automating significant portions of customer onboarding, support, and success functions.

What AI is Actually Automating

Based on the data and industry observations, here’s what’s likely happening behind these leaner structures:

Customer Onboarding & Implementation

•AI-powered onboarding sequences that guide customers through setup

•Automated technical implementation for straightforward use cases

•Smart documentation that adapts based on customer configuration

•Predictive issue resolution that prevents support tickets before they happen

Customer Success & Support

•Automated health scoring that identifies at-risk accounts without manual monitoring

•Proactive outreach triggers based on usage patterns and engagement

•Self-service troubleshooting powered by AI knowledge bases

•Automated renewal processes for straightforward accounts

Sales Operations

•Intelligent lead scoring that reduces manual qualification

•Automated proposal generation customized for specific use cases

•Real-time deal coaching that helps reps close without manager intervention

•Dynamic pricing optimization based on prospect characteristics

Marketing Operations

•Automated content generation for campaigns, emails, and social

•Dynamic personalization at scale without manual segmentation

•Automated lead nurturing sequences that adapt based on engagement

The Efficiency vs Effectiveness Balance

The critical insight here isn’t just that AI enables smaller teams—it’s that smaller, AI-augmented teams can be more effective than larger traditional teams.

Why This Works:

1. Reduced coordination overhead: Fewer people means less time spent in meetings and handoffs
2. Higher-value focus: Team members spend time on strategic work rather than routine tasks
3. Faster decision-making: Smaller teams can pivot and adapt more quickly
4. Better talent density: Budget saved on headcount can be invested in higher-quality hires

The Quality Question: Some skeptics might argue that leaner teams provide worse customer experience. But the data suggests otherwise—companies with high AI adoption actually show lower late renewal rates (23% vs 25%) and higher quota attainment (61% vs 56%).

The $50M+ ARR Reality Check

Here’s where the story gets interesting: The efficiency advantages don’t automatically scale.

Looking at larger companies ($50M+ ARR), the headcount differences between high and low AI adopters become much smaller:

• $50M-$100M ARR companies:
• High AI adoption: 54 GTM FTEs
• Low AI adoption: 68 GTM FTEs (26% difference, not 38%)
• $100M-$250M ARR companies:
• High AI adoption: 150 GTM FTEs
• Low AI adoption: 134 GTM FTEs (Actually higher headcount!)

Why Scaling Changes the Game:

1. Organizational complexity: Larger teams require more coordination regardless of AI tools
2. Customer complexity: Enterprise deals often require human relationship management
3. Process complexity: More sophisticated sales processes may still need human oversight
4. Change management: Larger organizations are slower to adopt and optimize AI workflows

This suggests that AI’s leverage advantage is most pronounced in the early stages of company building—making it crucial for founders to embrace AI-native approaches before traditional organizational patterns become entrenched.

Related topic:

AI Automation: A Strategic Pathway to Enterprise Intelligence in the Era of Task Reconstruction
Maximizing Efficiency and Insight with HaxiTAG LLM Studio, Innovating Enterprise SolutionsEnhancing Enterprise Development: Applications of
Large Language Models and Generative AIUnlocking Enterprise Success: The Trifecta of Knowledge, Public Opinion, and IntelligenceRevolutionizing Information Processing in Enterprise Services: The Innovative Integration of GenAI, LLM, and Omni ModelMastering Market Entry: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding and Navigating New Business Landscapes in Global MarketsHaxiTAG's LLMs and GenAI Industry Applications - Trusted AI SolutionsEnterprise AI Solutions: Enhancing Efficiency and Growth with Advanced AI Capabilities

Read more →

Builder’s Guide for the Generative AI Era: Technical Playbooks and Industry Trends

A Deep Dive into the 2025 State of AI Report

As generative AI moves from labs into industry deep waters, the key challenge facing every tech enterprise is no longer technical feasibility, but how to translate AI's potential into tangible product value. The 2025 State of AI Report, published by ICONIQ Capital, surveys over 300 software executives and introduces a Builder’s Playbook for the Generative AI Era, offering a full-cycle blueprint from planning to production. This report not only maps out the current technological landscape but also pinpoints the critical vectors of evolution, providing actionable frameworks for builders navigating the AI frontier.

The Technology Stack Landscape: Infrastructure Blueprint for Generative AI

The deployment of generative AI hinges on a robust stack of tools. Just as constructing a house requires a full set of materials, building AI products requires tools spanning training, development, inference, and monitoring. While the current ecosystem has stabilized to some extent, it remains in rapid flux.

In model training and fine-tuning, PyTorch and TensorFlow dominate, jointly commanding over 50% market share, due to their rich ecosystems and community momentum. AWS SageMaker and OpenAI’s fine-tuning services follow, appealing to teams seeking low-code, out-of-the-box solutions. Hugging Face and Databricks Mosaic are gaining traction rapidly—the former known for its open model hub and user-friendly tuning utilities, the latter for integrating model workflows within data lake architectures—signaling a new wave of open-source and cloud-native convergence.

In application development, LangChain and Hugging Face lead the pack, powering applications such as chatbots and document intelligence, with a combined penetration exceeding 60%. Security reinforcement has become critical: 30% of companies now employ tools like Guardrails to constrain model output and filter sensitive content. Meanwhile, high-abstraction tools like Vercel AI SDK are lowering the entry barrier for developers, enabling fast prototyping without deep understanding of model internals.

For monitoring and observability, the industry is transitioning from legacy APMs (e.g., Datadog, New Relic) to AI-native platforms. While half still rely on traditional tools, newer solutions like LangSmith and Weights & Biases—each with ~17% adoption—offer better support for tracking prompt-output mappings and behavioral drift. However, 10% of respondents remain unaware of what monitoring stack is in use, reflecting gaps that may create downstream risk.

Inference optimization shows a heavy reliance on NVIDIA—over 60% use TensorRT with Triton to boost throughput and reduce GPU cost. Among non-NVIDIA solutions, ONNX Runtime leads (18%), offering cross-platform flexibility. Still, 17% of firms lack any inference optimization, risking latency and cost issues under load.

In model hosting and vector databases, zero-deployment APIs from foundation model vendors are the dominant hosting choice, followed by AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex for their multi-cloud advantages. In vector databases, Elastic and Pinecone lead on search maturity, while Redis and ClickHouse address needs for real-time and cost-sensitive applications.

Model Strategy: A Gradient from API Dependence to Customization

Choosing the right model and usage approach is central to product success. The report identifies a clear gradient of model strategies, ranging from API usage to fine-tuning and full in-house model development.

Third-party APIs remain the norm: 80% of companies use external APIs (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic), far surpassing those doing fine-tuning (61%) or developing models in-house (32%). For most, APIs offer the fastest way to test ideas with minimal investment—ideal for early-stage exploration. However, high-growth companies show bolder strategies: 77% fine-tune models, and 54% build their own, significantly above the average. As products scale, generic models hit their accuracy ceilings, driving demand for domain-specific customization and IP-based differentiation.

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and fine-tuning are the most widely adopted techniques (each ~67%). RAG boosts factual accuracy by injecting external knowledge—critical in legal or medical contexts—while fine-tuning adjusts models to domain-specific language and logic using minimal data. Only 31% conduct full pretraining, as it remains prohibitively expensive and typically reserved for hyperscalers.

Infrastructure choices reflect a preference for cloud-native: 68% run fully in the cloud, 64% rely on external APIs, only 23% use hybrid deployments, and a mere 8% run fully on-prem. This points to a cost-sensitive model where renting compute outpaces building in-house capacity.

Model selection criteria diverge by use case. For external-facing products, accuracy (77%) is paramount, followed by cost (57%) and tunability (41%). For internal tools, cost (72%) leads, followed by privacy and compliance. This dual standard shows that AI is a stickier value proposition for external engagement, and an efficiency lever internally.

Implementation Challenges: From Technical Hurdles to Business Proof

Getting from “0 to 1” is relatively straightforward—going from “1 to 100” is where most struggle. The report outlines three primary obstacles:

1. Hallucination: The top issue. When uncertain, models fabricate plausible but incorrect outputs—unacceptable in sensitive domains like contracts or diagnostics. RAG can mitigate but not fully solve this.

2. Explainability and trust: The “black-box” nature of AI undermines user confidence, especially in domains like finance or autonomous driving where the rationale often matters more than the output itself.

3. ROI justification: AI investment is ongoing (compute, talent, data), but returns are often indirect (e.g., productivity gains). Only 55% of companies can currently track ROI—highlighting a major decision-making bottleneck.

Monitoring maturity scales with product stage: over 75% of GA or scaling-stage products employ advanced or automated monitoring (e.g., drift detection, feedback loops, auto-retraining). In contrast, many pre-launch products rely on minimal or no monitoring, risking failure at scale.

Agentic Workflows: The Rise of Automation-First Systems

As discrete AI capabilities mature, focus is shifting toward end-to-end task automation—enter the age of Agentic Workflows. AI agents autonomously interpret user intent, decompose tasks, and orchestrate tool usage (e.g., fetching data, writing reports, sending emails), solving the classic problem of “data-rich, insight-poor” operations.

High-growth firms are leading the charge: 47% have deployed agents in production vs. 23% overall. This leap moves AI from augmenting to replacing human labor, especially in repeatable processes like customer support, logistics, or finance.

Notably, 80% of AI-native companies use Agentic Workflows, signaling a paradigm shift from “prompt-response” to workflow orchestration. Tomorrow’s AI will behave more like a “digital coworker” than a reactive plugin.

Costs and Resources: From Burn Rate to Operational Discipline

The “burn rate” of generative AI is well understood, but as maturity rises, companies are moving toward proactive cost optimization.

AI-enabled firms now allocate 15%-25% of R&D budgets to AI (up from 10%-15% in 2024). Crucially, budget structures shift with product maturity: early on, talent accounts for 57% of spend (hiring ML engineers, data scientists), but at scale, this drops to 36%, with inference (up to 22%) and storage (up to 12%) growing substantially. Inference becomes the dominant cost center in operational phases.

Pain points are predictable: 70% cite API usage fees as hardest to manage (due to volume-based pricing), followed by inference (49%) and fine-tuning (48%). In response, cost strategies include:

• 41% shift to open-source models to avoid API fees,

• 37% optimize inference to maximize hardware utilization,

• 32% use quantization/distillation to compress model size and reduce runtime costs.

Internal Productivity: How AI Is Rewiring Organizations

Beyond external products, internal AI adoption is reshaping organizational efficiency. Budgets for internal AI are expected to nearly double in 2025, reaching 1%-8% of revenue. Large enterprises (> $500M) are reallocating from R&D and operations, and 27% are tapping into HR budgets—substituting headcount with automation.

Yet tool penetration lags actual usage: While 70% of employees have access to AI tools, only 50% use them regularly—dropping to 44% in enterprises > $1B revenue. This reflects poor tool-job fit and insufficient user training or change management.

Top internal use cases: code generation, content creation, and knowledge retrieval. High-growth firms generate 33% of code via AI—vs. 27% for others—making AI a central force in development velocity.

ROI metrics prioritize productivity gains (75%), then cost savings (51%), with revenue growth (20%) trailing. This confirms AI’s core internal role is cost and time efficiency.

Key Trends: Six Strategic Directions for Generative AI

The report outlines six trends that will shape the next 1–3 years of competition:

1. AI-Native Speed Advantage: AI-first firms outpace AI-enabled peers in launch and scale, thanks to aligned teams, tolerant funding models, and optimized stacks.

2. Cost Pressure Moves Upstream: As GPU access normalizes, cost has become a top-3 buying factor. API fees are now the #1 pain point, driving demand for operational excellence.

3. Rise of Agentic Workflows: 80% of AI-native firms use multi-step automation, signaling a shift from prompt-based tools to end-to-end orchestration.

4. Split Criteria for Models: External apps prioritize accuracy; internal apps prioritize cost and compliance. This dual standard demands flexible, case-by-case model governance.

5. Governance Becomes Institutionalized: 66% meet basic compliance (e.g., GDPR), and 38% have formal AI policies. Human-in-the-loop remains the most common safeguard (47%). Governance is now a launch requirement—not a post-facto fix.

6. Monitoring Market Remains Fragmented: Traditional APMs still dominate, but AI-native observability platforms are gaining ground. This nascent market is ripe for innovation and consolidation.

Conclusion: A Builder’s Action Checklist

The 2025 State of AI Report offers a clear roadmap for builders:

• Tech stack: Tailor toolchains to your product stage, balancing agility and control.

• Modeling strategy: Differentiate by scenario—use RAG, fine-tuning, or agents where they best fit.

• Cost control: Track and optimize cost across the lifecycle—from API usage to inference and retraining.

• Governance: Embed compliance and monitoring early—don’t bolt them on later.

Generative AI is reshaping entire industries—but its real value lies not in the technology itself, but in how deeply builders embed it into context. This report unveils validated playbooks from industry leaders—understanding them may just unlock the secret to moving from follower to frontrunner in the AI era.

Related Topic

Enhancing Customer Engagement with Chatbot Service
HaxiTAG ESG Solution: The Data-Driven Approach to Corporate Sustainability
Simplifying ESG Reporting with HaxiTAG ESG Solutions
The Adoption of General Artificial Intelligence: Impacts, Best Practices, and Challenges
The Significance of HaxiTAG's Intelligent Knowledge System for Enterprises and ESG Practitioners: A Data-Driven Tool for Business Operations Analysis
HaxiTAG AI Solutions: Driving Enterprise Private Deployment Strategies
HaxiTAG EiKM: Transforming Enterprise Innovation and Collaboration Through Intelligent Knowledge Management
AI-Driven Content Planning and Creation Analysis
AI-Powered Decision-Making and Strategic Process Optimization for Business Owners: Innovative Applications and Best Practices
In-Depth Analysis of the Potential and Challenges of Enterprise Adoption of Generative AI (GenAI)

Read more →

Slack Leading the AI Collaboration Paradigm Shift: A Systemic Overhaul from Information Silos to an Intelligent Work OS

At a critical juncture in enterprise digital transformation, the report “10 Ways to Transform Your Work with AI in Slack” offers a clear roadmap for upgrading collaboration practices. It positions Slack as an “AI-powered Work OS” that, through dialog-driven interactions, agent-based automation, conversational customer data integration, and no-code workflow tools, addresses four pressing enterprise pain points: information silos, redundant processes, fragmented customer insights, and cross-organization collaboration barriers. This represents a substantial technological leap and organizational evolution in enterprise collaboration.

From Messaging Tool to Work OS: Redefining Collaboration through AI

No longer merely a messaging platform akin to “Enterprise WeChat,” Slack has strategically repositioned itself as an end-to-end Work Operating System. At the core of this transformation is the introduction of natural language-driven AI agents, which seamlessly connect people, data, systems, and workflows through conversation, thereby creating a semantically unified collaboration context and significantly enhancing productivity and agility.

1. Team of AI Agents: Within Slack’s Agent Library, users can deploy function-specific agents (e.g., Deal Support Specialist). By using @mentions, employees engage these agents via natural language, transforming AI from passive tool to active collaborator—marking a shift from tool usage to intelligent partnership.

2. Conversational Customer Data: Through deep integration with Salesforce, CRM data is both accessible and actionable directly within Slack channels, eliminating the need to toggle between systems. This is particularly impactful for frontline functions like sales and customer support, where it accelerates response times by up to 30%.

3. No-/Low-Code Automation: Slack’s Workflow Builder empowers business users to automate tasks such as onboarding and meeting summarization without writing code. This AI-assisted workflow design lowers the automation barrier and enables business-led development, democratizing process innovation.

Four Pillars of AI-Enhanced Collaboration

The report outlines four replicable approaches for building an AI-augmented collaboration system within the enterprise:

• 1) AI Agent Deployment: Embed role-based AI agents into Slack channels. With NLU and backend API integration, these agents gain contextual awareness, perform task execution, and interface with systems—ideal for IT support and customer service scenarios.

• 2) Conversational CRM Integration: Salesforce channels do more than display data; they allow real-time customer updates via natural language, bridging communication and operational records. This centralizes lifecycle management and drives sales efficiency.

• 3) No-Code Workflow Tools (Workflow Builder): By linking Slack with tools like G Suite and Asana, users can automate business processes such as onboarding, approvals, and meetings through pre-defined triggers. AI can draft these workflows, significantly lowering the effort needed to implement end-to-end automation.

• 4) Asynchronous Collaboration Enhancements (Clips + Huddles): By integrating video and audio capabilities directly into Slack, Clips enable on-demand video updates (replacing meetings), while Huddles offer instant voice chats with auto-generated minutes—both vital for supporting global, asynchronous teams.

Constraints and Implementation Risks: A Systematic Analysis

Despite its promise, the report candidly identifies a range of limitations and risks:

Constraint Type	Specific Limitation	Impact Scope
Ecosystem Dependency	Key conversational CRM features require Salesforce licenses	Non-Salesforce users must reengineer system integration
AI Capability Limits	Search accuracy and agent performance depend heavily on data governance and access control	Poor data hygiene undermines agent utility
Security Management Challenges	Slack Connect requires manual security policy configuration for external collaboration	Misconfiguration may lead to compliance or data exposure risks
Development Resource Demand	Advanced agents require custom logic built with Python/Node.js	SMEs may lack the technical capacity for deployment

Enterprises must assess alignment with their IT maturity, skill sets, and collaboration goals. A phased implementation strategy is advisable—starting with low-risk domains like IT helpdesks, then gradually extending to sales, project management, and customer support.

Validation by Industry Practice and Deployment Recommendations

The report’s credibility is reinforced by empirical data: 82% of Fortune 100 companies use Slack Connect, and some organizations have replaced up to 30% of recurring meetings with Clips, demonstrating the model’s practical viability. From a regulatory compliance standpoint, adopting the Slack Enterprise Grid ensures robust safeguards across permissioning, data archiving, and audit logging—essential for GDPR and CCPA compliance.

Recommended enterprise adoption strategy:

1. Pilot in Low-Risk Use Cases: Validate ROI in areas like helpdesk automation or onboarding;

2. Invest in Data Asset Management: Build semantically structured knowledge bases to enhance AI’s search and reasoning capabilities;

3. Foster a Culture of Co-Creation: Shift from tool usage to AI-driven co-production, increasing employee engagement and ownership.

The Future of Collaborative AI: Implications for Organizational Transformation

The proposed triad—agent team formation, conversational data integration, and democratized automation—marks a fundamental shift from tool-based collaboration to AI-empowered organizational intelligence. Slack, as a pioneering “Conversational OS,” fosters a new work paradigm—one that evolves from command-response interactions to perceptive, co-creative workflows. This signals a systemic restructuring of organizational hierarchies, roles, technical stacks, and operational logics.

As AI capabilities continue to advance, collaborative platforms will evolve from information hubs to intelligence hubs, propelling enterprises toward adaptive, data-driven, and cognitively aligned collaboration. This transformation is more than a tool swap—it is a deep reconfiguration of cognition, structure, and enterprise culture.

Related topic:

Developing LLM-based GenAI Applications: Addressing Four Key Challenges to Overcome Limitations
Analysis of AI Applications in the Financial Services Industry
Application of HaxiTAG AI in Anti-Money Laundering (AML)
Analysis of HaxiTAG Studio's KYT Technical Solution
Strategies and Challenges in AI and ESG Reporting for Enterprises: A Case Study of HaxiTAG
HaxiTAG ESG Solutions: Best Practices Guide for ESG Reporting
Impact of Data Privacy and Compliance on HaxiTAG ESG System

Read more →